IT WAS OSWALD, this time it is massively clear,” we are told. No kidding. No use denying, by this time…
Sorry, it was someone else, or some others, it was, very occamistically-shown, not a weakly-hostile, derangedly-dreaming sensibility that did a job of work. Watch now, watch how:
Oswald did not shine as part of a firing-line trying out for a job. Oswald was a lousy shot, even a KGB defector would (and did) tell you that.
And this sensibility is parked, for the kill, six stories (and storeys) up and has a 6.5 Carcano carbine (not a rifle) with a deserved reputation of blowing up in your face… a bolt-action which emphatically is a dim idea for an assassination. Then there is the telescopic sight which is not/was not sighted-in; either that or someone tampered with irrelevant evidence. Pretty much the only sole truth spoken was said by Oswald, namely, that he was a patsy. As the poet says, I thirst for accusation.